In reference to a recent discussion about CNBC television host Suze Orman being open about her sexual orientation and the fact that it was not widely known amoung a small group: why in some cases is finding out/knowing about celebrities/public figures sexual preference(s) sometimes the most imperative factoid and with other celebrities it does not seem to matter? Does it have to due with the amount of popularity a person has accrued? Is the gender, age or race of the person held in regard?
For example, Adam Lambert of American Idol admitted he was gay in an article of Rolling Stone after the conclusion of the series' eighth season. Some dismissed the notion that he need not make a public statement on the matter, seeing as everyone already knew. So why wait until after the season finale? Why release an official statement at all? Was this based on personal choice or were there outside pressures to either officially declare himself (as if he was going through customs) or to postpone until a more 'convenient' time?
There are indeed many facets of this question to opine on (and subsequently to argue about), but what is it in general about the celebrity, the media and the layman that take these personal matters and sometimes outright exploits and in some cases tarnishes a person's image and conversely for others, simply accepting the fact and being almost apathetic toward the person?
*In a related topic, this may have some parallels to the Don't ask, don't tell policy which "prohibits anyone who 'demonstrate(s) a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts' from serving in the armed forces of the United States, because 'it would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.'" What makes these things so taboo in the eyes of the public, government and/or any higher power? ☕
No comments:
Post a Comment